Feed on
Posts
Comments

I was at the at the hospital this week and saw this new promotional poster for Australia’s Hudson’s coffee house. I just had to take a photo with my phone and get it on here. The poor client would have no idea who Parra is, or how this ‘lovely’ looking new promotional poster style is just a rip of his very unique typographical style.

This is the Hudson poster:

Hudson’s front page of their website:

Here are a couple of Parra’s works:

why post?yawn...on the fenceRippedMajor Rip! (217 votes, average: 1.38 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
3,140 views

33 Responses to “Australia’s Hudson Coffee rips Parra.”

  1. on 27 Nov 2008 at 1:21 am sam

    similar style… the ‘original’ didn’t create the style..

  2. on 27 Nov 2008 at 1:37 am kp

    No. Not a ripoff. Please, it’s not even close.
    I wouldn’t even say the the Hudson design was inspired by the other.
    I am a professional designer and art director, this comparison is laughable.

  3. on 27 Nov 2008 at 1:42 am am

    absolutely not. no similarities.

  4. on 27 Nov 2008 at 1:43 am YTWWN

    Hey Wolf, I see what you are saying, the designer may have been inspired by parra’s sytle but unfortunately you can’t copyright a style. If he had used any of parra’s elements (eg. traced the Y) then i would accept it as a rip but this just a case same style.

  5. on 27 Nov 2008 at 2:11 am TheWolf

    Fair comments. We are at a studio here, and everyone I showed instantly said what a rip of Parra. So I would say that if typographers and designers recognise the style as someone else’s, there seems to be a problem. Also, when it’s such an original hand drawn style of typography such as his, I tended to think that it was a little too close.

  6. on 27 Nov 2008 at 5:00 am XTC

    If that’s a rip of Parra, then what do you think about SoMe/Ed Banger records? Far more in common there, from colours to typographic style to composition. This is one of the worst posts I’ve seen on this site!

  7. on 27 Nov 2008 at 6:06 am Mark

    I agree, I really tried to see the “rip off” but I don’t think it is. I don’t think Parra has the rights to this style, or maybe Parra wants to sue The Beatles for their rip off of his style in “Yellow Submarine”.

  8. on 27 Nov 2008 at 6:39 am TheWolf

    I’m not talking about any other graphics that the ones mentioned, obviously, that would be an entire kettle of fish. I think the general tolerance levels for this kind of stuff are a little skewed to be honest. The Oxford dictionary defines a Rip-Off as: an inferior imitation of something. Which this clearly is… echo, echo, echo.

  9. on 27 Nov 2008 at 10:04 am victor

    come on, if this was a rip, we wouldn’t be allowed to do anything!

  10. on 27 Nov 2008 at 11:55 am Marc

    Meaning that the entire 60s and 70s was a rip of Hudson? This style saw Woodstock, The Beatles, Hendrix and a whole generation through. And much earlier than that we’re talking Art Nouveau, American Mid-West and PT Barnum.

    Don’t they do art history classes in college anymore?
    Admittedly it’s not an attractive application of the style, but then neither is Hudsons.

    =p Marc

  11. on 27 Nov 2008 at 3:06 pm geg

    YTTWN, maybe you can have a faq where you describe the difference between a rip and inspiration, and somehow force posters to read it before they post an item. Like answer a quick quiz that puts two images side by side that say “rip or inspiration?” and if they can’t figure these things out they don’t pollute the site

    i dunno

    people are so gay

  12. on 27 Nov 2008 at 8:10 pm Amber

    I don’t see this as a rip at all – not even close.

  13. on 27 Nov 2008 at 9:28 pm nomad

    W . T . F ?

  14. on 27 Nov 2008 at 10:56 pm Kylie

    Kind of similar, but before I scrolled down I had several other designers in mind of who they may of ripped, when I saw Para’s work… I was disappointed as it was not nearly as close as expected.

    Verdict: I think not

  15. on 28 Nov 2008 at 1:47 am hotpiss

    the Hudson looks like it whould sit well along side the artwork for http://www.puccinos.com/

    but maybe that’s just me, there website doesn’t have much of their ’style’ on it so i can’t really show show what i mean but i’m sure other UK readers know what i mean

  16. on 28 Nov 2008 at 10:33 am tom

    I’m sorry to say it, but neither of them are original, and both could easily coexist in this big world.

    If you “Found” a look on a piece of vintage art or design somewhere and someone else cops it, you make a complete ass of yourself saying they bit you. Make a note.

  17. on 28 Nov 2008 at 11:00 am erin

    you are so dumb.

  18. on 28 Nov 2008 at 4:26 pm Ronan

    Speaking as a typographer, I’d have to say – weak.

  19. on 01 Dec 2008 at 1:37 am Kelly

    If I had seen the examples elsewhere, I never would have made a connection that one had copied the other. Even sitting in here side by side, I fail to come up with the conclusion that one copied the other. Similar maybe, but so were a lot of 60’s and 70’s. Reminds me of my old Snoopy “Feelin’ Groovy” poster.

    : )

  20. on 01 Dec 2008 at 5:16 am LA Artist

    Parra is a newschool ripoff himself.

    Just because he got a bunch of fame as of late means nothing, he did not invent brush painted fonts like that. He mimics older styles from better artists, and then waters them down into his own blend.

  21. on 01 Dec 2008 at 2:45 pm janflora

    so if you disagree with a poster here is it ok to hurl insults and derogatory statements? People have a problem with others not distinguishing between “rip and inspiration” but apparently cannot distinguish between discourse and discourtesy…I thought I had found an intelligent site…

  22. on 01 Dec 2008 at 3:27 pm Stacy

    Wolf, your argument that this is a rip because of similar lettering is really thin.

    So, anyone who uses thick cursive bubbly writing is now ripping Parra’s work? I would be interested in hearing the detail of your argument.

  23. on 01 Dec 2008 at 9:17 pm G

    ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY not

  24. on 03 Dec 2008 at 12:28 pm J.James

    Herer’s come a new debate:

    GREMS
    vs
    PARRA
    vs
    SO_ME
    vs
    WHOEVER DRAWING ON A DARK BACKGROUND.

  25. on 03 Dec 2008 at 11:02 pm r-dizzle

    i love parra’s work, but if you claim that this is a rip-off of parra, then you’d have to say that parra ripped-off his style from countless designers before. hand-drawn type is NOT original, and artists and designers will continue to do it with their own style long after parra et. al. are dead. now if they had drawn duck-billed people, then that would be a rip-off. i actually heard that parra has a beef with so me. but to be honest, i don’t think their work looks that similar. go to a museum and you will find sitting side-by-side, hundreds of paintings that look very similar to each other. can you tell a picasso from a braque or gris?

  26. on 04 Dec 2008 at 9:22 pm john

    I think Todd James was doing this style before Parra.. oh wait, and about 100 other people before him.. oh well.

  27. on 05 Dec 2008 at 11:50 pm wth

    epic fail.

  28. on 09 Dec 2008 at 8:22 am Nea

    I can’t see the rip-off.
    It’s ok to copy ideas.

  29. on 12 Dec 2008 at 2:38 pm jAnsen

    seen this style millions of times. not a copy. not very original. still easy on the eyes.

  30. on 03 Mar 2009 at 12:30 am gaz

    same style can be found on teenage bad girl album art

  31. on 06 May 2009 at 2:42 pm TT

    wtf are you guys BLIND?
    The hudson ad has copied the EXACT drawings of parra, i mean, look at it! I’m not talking about ripping a style, but the hudson ad just copied the drawings 1 on 1, just look at the little details in the word ‘coffee break’.

  32. on 05 Jun 2009 at 7:52 am rompa

    gaz, that is a todd james work on the teenage bad girl cover. It was on show at the MC gallery not long ago

  33. on 28 Apr 2010 at 4:07 pm Anonymous

    This makes me sad… both have derived from an earlier style of typography, both are shite, but neither are copies.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply