Posted in animation, film | 19 Comments »

6,032 views

19 Responses to “Disney Vs Disney”

1. on 06 Jul 2007 at 12:36 am   Aaron

   I really don’t see why this is on the site. It’s all Disney. This is recycling, not ripping-off. Furthermore, everyone knows that Disney (and many other animation studios) reuse elements. This page scarcely scratches the surface.

2. on 09 Jul 2007 at 2:03 pm   Anonymous

   thats why he said “no its not a rip”

3. on 11 Jul 2007 at 12:09 am   Bill

   why waste your time putting it on here if it’s not a rip then?
   I got a chicken parmy the other day and I didn’t eat the salad, then I saw the same salad being re-used on someone else’s parmy. They thought I wouldn’t notice!!!

4. on 11 Jul 2007 at 11:14 pm   just some kid

   I dunno, I think it’s really interesting. Thanks for sharing!

5. on 11 Jul 2007 at 11:32 pm   citizen x

   since when was this site policed on content?

6. on 13 Jul 2007 at 4:22 am   School

   Their.
   There.
   They’re.

   Learn them!

   - Your Primary School Teacher

7. on 09 Aug 2007 at 1:24 am   caine

   Disney have been doing this for years….I saw a doco and they even went through it….they are not ashamed about it, but it is a little cheap. especially when they make truckloads on their films. and animations dont have to pay as much for big named actors….

8. on 09 Aug 2007 at 6:41 pm   yo momma

   Wow

9. on 19 Sep 2007 at 6:42 am   This is Funny « tekel

   [...] Sep 18th, 2007 by tekel If you’ve been reading about copyrights all night long.  What do you call it when Disney steals from themselves?  (Hint: look at the tree, as if it’s not totally obvious). [...]

10. on 15 Oct 2007 at 4:28 am   North Cyprus property

    thats wrong , what are the animators doing ?their ideas have been finished?

11. on 12 Nov 2007 at 5:51 pm   Dude

    Chill out, fags. It’s not a rip but it’s still interesting to see the similarities. You guys need to quit getting all ass-hurt.

12. on 30 Nov 2007 at 6:37 pm   Blogvorstellung: you thought we wouldn’t notice

    [...] Heute möchte ich euch einen coolen Blog vorstellen, der sich mit “Design-Klau” beschäftigt. Der Blogger hat schon viel Material gesammelt und zeigt wie beispielsweise die Designer von Britney Spears oder japanische/chinesische Autofirmen Designs klauen. Am coolsten fand ich diesen Disney – internen Klau für Winnie Puh: Disney’s Winnie Puh Klau [...]

13. on 11 Jan 2008 at 4:10 am   PrettyMuch

    I don’t even find this interesting. These are both very old films that had to be hand drawn, each frame. Meticulous, tedious, and time consuming. It makes amazing sense that animators would reuse a basic forest template. Imagine the hours extra unneeded work they would have to do for a child’s film. Kids don’t care about these details. More power to Disney on this one.

14. on 10 Feb 2008 at 7:19 pm   jadeth

    and i think winnie the pooh is hott.
    there i have the best comment.

    GO ME.

    love the pics tho. xo

15. on 02 Mar 2008 at 10:38 am   LiLi

    I agree with “prettymuch.” If people had a good grasp of what the process of animation entailed before computers, they wouldn’t get excited about this. Hence why kids movies are twice as long as they used to be (it certainly isn’t because kids have longer attention spans now).

    I do find it interesting, but only from a trivia perspective.

    People oughta get worked up over the crap quality of Disney’s straight to dvd sequels.

16. on 14 Apr 2009 at 2:37 pm   you thought we wouldn’t notice » Blog Archive » Disney X Disney

    [...] have had a post about how disney re use there own imagery before but it is amazing to see it [...]

17. on 14 Apr 2009 at 10:34 pm   Michal

    wow! how did you notice that?

18. on 15 Apr 2009 at 2:01 pm   Kirvi

    I find it interesting because I probaly wouldn’t have noticed otherwise.

19. on 11 May 2009 at 12:02 am   gilleruadh

    Many years ago I saw a film that showed how the Snow White animation cells were drawn from actual film footage of a young woman dancing. I suspect that many scenes from Disney animations started that way.
    Remember, when these films were made, each film cell was drawn, inked and painted in by hand. Each feature length film required up to 500,000 cells and hundreds of artists; which required years of labor. Not a cheap undertaking at the time.
    The Disney folks were not foolish to use the same animation templates over and over. They were using the most expedient animation techniques available at the time.

Leave a Reply

Name

Mail (hidden)

Website