[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptFrom a post on Engadget.com:. Nano’s vs. Cybershot’s. [...]
on 27 Oct 2007 at 12:25 am Boothy
Hahah, why would you bother copying this?!?!?
on 28 Oct 2007 at 10:42 pm Red
Not even the same sort of product. It’s called a Colour Forecast, I believe.
on 28 Oct 2007 at 10:43 pm Red
Oh wait…was that an ad or something? Then..yes. It is a rip-off, of some sort.
on 29 Oct 2007 at 8:10 am Anonymous
I’m confused?! There’s gotta be a good story behind this, I mean why would they bother? I just can’t see any point whatsoever, I guess it is pretty though…
[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptFrom a post on Engadget.com:. Nano’s vs. Cybershot’s. [...]
Hahah, why would you bother copying this?!?!?
Not even the same sort of product. It’s called a Colour Forecast, I believe.
Oh wait…was that an ad or something? Then..yes. It is a rip-off, of some sort.
I’m confused?! There’s gotta be a good story behind this, I mean why would they bother? I just can’t see any point whatsoever, I guess it is pretty though…
Jalla jalla – Its raining gadgets – thats never a bad thing, or is it? It could be the 11th plague of the post modern society
Certainly a rip
The 11th plague of the post modern – raining gadgets-
Certainly a rip.
omg
i can totally coordinate my ipod with my camera
Don’t use an apostrophe to indicate plural*, dammit.
“Nanos vs. Cybershots”
(*Acronyms are a rare exception.)
that’s just funny!
I my gosh becky I need a Cyber shot to match my ipod….Totally!
its just a bit pathetic really, are we sure the photography wasn’t done by the same photographer? that could potentially have something to do with it.