<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the Files of AttorneyScott &#8211; C. Wonder Allegedly Flies Too Close to the Sun; is Charged with Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/</link>
	<description>but we did...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181813</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181813</guid>
		<description>Since no one has commented on the case at hand, I guess that it goes without saying that the thievery of artistic content in this case is undeniable and indefensible.

The laziness of doing this and the balls to do it without changing a thing...sheesh !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since no one has commented on the case at hand, I guess that it goes without saying that the thievery of artistic content in this case is undeniable and indefensible.</p>
<p>The laziness of doing this and the balls to do it without changing a thing&#8230;sheesh !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATTORNEYSCOTT</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181811</link>
		<dc:creator>ATTORNEYSCOTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181811</guid>
		<description>Anon1:

Thank you for your comments. One of the purposes of the site is to encourage dialogue and resolution between the artists and alleged infringers. If viewers of the site would prefer we do things differently, please let us know, as we are always looking for ways to improve the site. I can be reached at scott@copyrightLA.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon1:</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments. One of the purposes of the site is to encourage dialogue and resolution between the artists and alleged infringers. If viewers of the site would prefer we do things differently, please let us know, as we are always looking for ways to improve the site. I can be reached at <a href="mailto:scott@copyrightLA.com">scott@copyrightLA.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Nonymous</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Nonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181800</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how copyists live with themselves....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how copyists live with themselves&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon1</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181531</link>
		<dc:creator>anon1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181531</guid>
		<description>Thanks for replying. It seems an odd way to run the site, that people are allowed to delete content themselves. They have also deleted my content. There seems little point in me ever posting here if the article originator can just delete entire articles and all content whenever they chose. It creates a very unhealthy balance and bias, and effectively gives the ability to silence critics completely. It also means, as in the case of the owl sweater, they can make a claim against another party, be revealed as actually being no better themselves, but then clear all evidence of any of it ever occurring. Seems ridiculous. If the rest of the internet operated this way it would be a farce, as it is here. I doubt I&#039;ll ever post here again tbh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for replying. It seems an odd way to run the site, that people are allowed to delete content themselves. They have also deleted my content. There seems little point in me ever posting here if the article originator can just delete entire articles and all content whenever they chose. It creates a very unhealthy balance and bias, and effectively gives the ability to silence critics completely. It also means, as in the case of the owl sweater, they can make a claim against another party, be revealed as actually being no better themselves, but then clear all evidence of any of it ever occurring. Seems ridiculous. If the rest of the internet operated this way it would be a farce, as it is here. I doubt I&#8217;ll ever post here again tbh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AttorneyScott</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181525</link>
		<dc:creator>AttorneyScott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181525</guid>
		<description>Hello Anon1 and Sarah G:

Because the majority of the articles posted here are submitted by our viewers, the people that post have the option of removing their post should the situation that they posted about be resolved. 

My understanding is that the individual that posted the owl sweater article decided to remove it from the site. It&#039;s a shame because it was an interesting discussion. I would encourage future posters to leave their posts on the site and simply add a message to the original post stating that the issue has been resolved.

-ATTORNEYSCOTT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Anon1 and Sarah G:</p>
<p>Because the majority of the articles posted here are submitted by our viewers, the people that post have the option of removing their post should the situation that they posted about be resolved. </p>
<p>My understanding is that the individual that posted the owl sweater article decided to remove it from the site. It&#8217;s a shame because it was an interesting discussion. I would encourage future posters to leave their posts on the site and simply add a message to the original post stating that the issue has been resolved.</p>
<p>-ATTORNEYSCOTT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah G</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181488</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181488</guid>
		<description>I also had come to comment on the owl sweater article but can&#039;t find it?!!

I told my mum, who is an avid knitter, about the possible design theft by Debenhams. She produced an photo of herself in the early 1970s wearing a very similar sweater that her mother had knitted for her! I highly doubt that Kate invented the pattern and was not inspired from elsewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had come to comment on the owl sweater article but can&#8217;t find it?!!</p>
<p>I told my mum, who is an avid knitter, about the possible design theft by Debenhams. She produced an photo of herself in the early 1970s wearing a very similar sweater that her mother had knitted for her! I highly doubt that Kate invented the pattern and was not inspired from elsewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon1</title>
		<link>http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/from-the-files-of-attorneyscott-c-wonder-flies-too-close-to-the-sun-is-charged-with-infringement/#comment-181484</link>
		<dc:creator>anon1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=16126#comment-181484</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a comment about this article at all really, but I could find no way to comment to you directly about the recent owl knitting pattern article that has now been deleted. It was particularly interesting. The original poster had claimed Debenhams had stolen her pattern, for which they settled in an amicable fashion without agreeing with her ownership of the design . It then transpired the owl pattern was not originated by her at all, and Debenhams had been perhaps a little duped. It was a particularly interesting case for the archives of ytwwn. Could I ask why it was deleted rather than left here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a comment about this article at all really, but I could find no way to comment to you directly about the recent owl knitting pattern article that has now been deleted. It was particularly interesting. The original poster had claimed Debenhams had stolen her pattern, for which they settled in an amicable fashion without agreeing with her ownership of the design . It then transpired the owl pattern was not originated by her at all, and Debenhams had been perhaps a little duped. It was a particularly interesting case for the archives of ytwwn. Could I ask why it was deleted rather than left here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
